Aristotelian Aporetic Ontology in Islamic and Christian Thinkers

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, 1983 - 314 pages
This is a ground-breaking study of the consequences of a central problem in Aristotle's Metaphysics in the interpretation given to it by Islamic and Christian Aristotelian philosophers: the relationship between individuals as individuals, and individuals as instances of a universal. Father Booth begins from an examination of the factors causing the aporia in the centre of Aristotle's ontology, going on to elaborate the way in which it occurred sometimes with confused reactions among the Greek, Syrian and Arab commentators, and to note in particular the modifications to the weighting of elements in Aristotle's ontological figures (differing in detail, but in tendency the same) when his ontology was brought into the union with Platonist and other thought conventionally known as `Neoplatonism'. The discussion culminates in two chapters on the different reconciliations of the radical Aristotelian and the Neoplatonist traditions, proposed by Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas, in which the factors in the aporia have a key importance.
 

Contents

Posterior Analytics
6
The radical Aristotelian tradition before Alexander of Aphrodisia
25
The ontology of Proclus
48
AND MONOTHEIST MODIFICATIONS TO
56
ABRAHAM
95
Maimonides
152
A LOGICOEMANATIONIST FIGURE
163
Alberts comments on God as substantificator in the commentary
202
Conclusion
268
Bibliography
276
Index
291
268
310
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information